In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
24d
The statement engages with a public discourse on AI safety and the alignment of large language models (LLMs). It questions whether current approaches are sufficient or if new strategies are needed, referencing a broader conversation about AI risks and control.
- The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive dialogue about AI safety, which is a critical public issue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By questioning current approaches and seeking input from experts, the statement promotes understanding and encourages a collaborative effort to address AI safety. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue and does not engage in personal attacks, maintaining a focus on the topic rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to discuss AI safety, a significant societal concern, thus contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by engaging in a responsible discussion about AI safety and alignment. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.