Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
In reply to:
Lawrence Chan
@justanotherlaw
·
18d

The statement is part of a broader discussion on AI safety and the development of new AI paradigms, which constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to technology and safety.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but suggests a need for more effort in AI safety, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more of a critique without offering constructive suggestions.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is a critique of current efforts in AI safety but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a neutral tone. [+1]