Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
6/23/2025, 3:40:59 AM
X
In reply to:
greyfedora0
@greyfedora0
·
17d
@GaryMarcus Adapt, boomer
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
17d
my disappointment with the e/acc community is that they never engage in intellectual argument, only name calling.

unfortunately, my disappointment with the EA and x-risk community is not entirely different; for all their talk of rationalism, they rarely engage directly with

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a conversation about the quality of intellectual argument within certain communities, which is a public issue related to discourse and debate culture.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses the word 'stupid,' which can be considered harmful and dismissive, violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others by calling an answer 'stupid,' which can be seen as a form of verbal harassment. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to name-calling rather than addressing the argument or providing a reasoned response. [-2]