Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
In reply to:
Lawrence Chan
@justanotherlaw
·
17d

The statement is part of a broader discussion on the allocation of resources and efforts within the AI research community, particularly focusing on alternative approaches to AI development. It critiques the current focus and suggests that the lack of compelling results from the majority approach should be a warning sign.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of current efforts, which is a part of healthy discourse.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement indirectly promotes understanding by highlighting the need to reassess current efforts in AI research. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the lack of results from the current focus, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to suggest a reevaluation of priorities in AI research, aiming for better outcomes. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by contributing to a critical discussion on AI research priorities. [+1]