Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64

The statement critiques the current strategies employed by the AI Safety community, suggesting that the focus on scaling, system prompts, and reinforcement learning (RL) may not be effective given the problems observed. It calls for exploring alternative approaches, indicating a concern for improving AI safety practices.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and raises a concern about current practices, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By questioning current strategies and suggesting the need for alternatives, the statement promotes understanding and encourages a re-evaluation of approaches, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the effectiveness of current strategies without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to advocate for better AI safety practices, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech responsibly by raising a valid concern about AI safety practices, aligning with the principle of using one's platform with integrity. [+1]