Yeongsan Shin | SHY001
@sannn_00100
·
15d
The statement and the conversation it references constitute public discourse as they engage with the public issue of AI safety and alignment, discussing the strategies and challenges faced by the AI Safety community.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses frustration with the AI Safety community's approach, which could be seen as a critique rather than harmful.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement could promote understanding by highlighting the need for alternative approaches in AI safety, but it lacks empathy and compassion in its tone. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the current strategies of the AI Safety community, but it could be perceived as dismissive rather than inviting dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by questioning existing strategies and using the platform to discuss public concerns about AI safety. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.