In reply to:
🚨 Katherine Brodsky
@mysteriouskat
·
13d
The statement criticizes the progressive left for not disowning an extreme position taken by a group, implying a loss of credibility if they don't. It engages in public discourse by addressing political alignment and credibility issues.
- The statement could be seen as contributing to polarization by demanding disownment, which may not promote understanding or empathy. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it challenges the credibility of a political group.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead issues a blanket criticism, which could be seen as a form of personal attack on the group's credibility. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.