Jill Stien

The statement expresses skepticism about the reliability of Israeli military data, implying potential misinformation or underreporting. The tone is critical and suggests distrust, which can contribute to public discourse by questioning the accuracy of information in conflict situations.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could potentially harm by spreading distrust without evidence, but it also encourages scrutiny of data sources. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the tone could be seen as dismissive.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it lacks evidence or alternative perspectives. [-1]