Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement presents a critical view of U.S. foreign policy, specifically its military actions in Muslim-majority countries over the past 15 years. It lists countries that have been bombed and questions the reasons behind anti-American sentiments, indicated by the hashtag #WhyDoTheyHateUs. The tone is critical and seeks to provoke thought and discussion about the consequences of U.S. military interventions.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as provocative. It raises awareness of military actions, which could be seen as a call to consider the harm caused by such actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by highlighting a pattern of military interventions, prompting reflection on their impact. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques policy decisions, aligning with constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By questioning U.S. military actions, the statement uses influence to encourage debate on foreign policy, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing a significant public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.