Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
6/24/2025, 9:55:19 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
16d
@flowersslop @mark_k @MLStreetTalk @DanHendrycks @DKokotajlo he also called the issue that Apple and this new paper pointed out 30 years ago.

and published about it in Science.

and wrote 6 books.

and built 2 AI companies and sold one on the internet

but no matter, people can make up lies about you anyway
Flowers ☾ ❂
@flowersslop
·
16d
@mark_k @MLStreetTalk @GaryMarcus @DanHendrycks @DKokotajlo He has a lot of knowledge about neurosciene.
Mark Kretschmann
@mark_k
·
16d
@MLStreetTalk @GaryMarcus @DanHendrycks @DKokotajlo Gary is not an expert on anything.
Machine Learning Street Talk
@MLStreetTalk
·
16d
AI safety experts @GaryMarcus, @DanHendrycks, and @DKokotajlo debate AGI timelines, alignment failures, and geopolitical risks. Here are some of the best clips.

The conversation involves a debate about expertise and contributions in AI, with some participants defending an individual's credentials and others questioning them. The tone is defensive and somewhat contentious, focusing on personal achievements and credibility.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement partially adheres to the principle of doing no harm, as it defends an individual's expertise but also involves a defensive tone that could escalate tensions.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but could be seen as engaging in a form of public disagreement that might affect dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not fully engage in constructive criticism, as it involves personal defense rather than focusing on the substantive issues of the debate. [-1]