Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the limitations of neural networks and large language models (LLMs) in reasoning outside familiar contexts, particularly in mathematics. The conversation highlights ongoing research and benchmarks aimed at evaluating and improving LLMs' capabilities.
- The statement and conversation do not cause harm and focus on advancing understanding in AI research. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The discussion promotes understanding and empathy by addressing the challenges and potential of LLMs in a constructive manner. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The conversation engages in constructive criticism by highlighting limitations and proposing benchmarks to address them. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.