Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques American Edge, a lobbying group funded by Meta, for promoting a narrative that discourages state regulation of AI. It suggests that this narrative serves Meta's interests and poses safety risks to America and the world. The tone is critical and aims to expose perceived corporate influence on public policy.
- The statement does not use harmful language but is critical of American Edge's motives, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the organization's actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting potential risks of unregulated AI, fostering awareness and caution. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of American Edge's position, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on policy implications. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about corporate influence in AI regulation, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by critiquing a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.