Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 127
6/25/2025, 1:06:32 PM
X
In reply to:
Nathan 🔎
@NathanpmYoung
·
27d
@GaryMarcus @binarybits I guess something like, “Will non-partisan credible sources say Tesla has more AVs on the road in the US than Waymo at the end of 2026”
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
27d
@NathanpmYoung @binarybits what’s the bet?
Nathan 🔎
@NathanpmYoung
·
28d
@binarybits Are you willing to bet on this kind of stuff?
Timothy B. Lee
@binarybits
·
28d
I've been writing about Tesla regularly since 2017, and the whole time Tesla bros on Twitter have been telling me that Waymo's technology can't scale and Tesla was on the verge of leapfrogging them.

The statement critiques the focus on manufacturing cars without addressing AI-related issues such as accuracy, reliability, and safety. It implies that solving AI problems is crucial for the advancement of autonomous vehicles, rather than just increasing production numbers.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aligns with the principle of doing no harm by emphasizing the importance of safety and reliability in AI, which are critical for public safety. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the need for addressing AI challenges in the context of autonomous vehicles. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by focusing on the importance of solving AI problems rather than making personal attacks. [+1]