Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
6/25/2025, 1:22:57 PM
X
In reply to:
Timothy B. Lee
@binarybits
·
221d
@NathanpmYoung @GaryMarcus This is why I think weekly driverless robotaxi rides is a good metric. Regulators won’t tolerate a robotaxi fleet at Waymo’s unless it is reasonably safe.
Nathan 🔎
@NathanpmYoung
·
221d
@GaryMarcus @binarybits Sure but will they get regulatory approval if they are dangerous?

Can you think of a source you’d trust?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
221d
@NathanpmYoung @binarybits without a measure of accuracy or reliability or safety that’s just about manufacturing cars, not solving the AI problems.
Nathan 🔎
@NathanpmYoung
·
221d
@GaryMarcus @binarybits I guess something like, “Will non-partisan credible sources say Tesla has more AVs on the road in the US than Waymo at the end of 2026”
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
221d
@NathanpmYoung @binarybits what’s the bet?
Nathan 🔎
@NathanpmYoung
·
222d
@binarybits Are you willing to bet on this kind of stuff?

The statement is part of a public discourse about the influence of Elon Musk and Tesla on regulatory matters in Texas, particularly in the context of autonomous vehicles. The conversation involves a discussion on the safety and regulatory approval of driverless technology, which is a significant public issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is neutral in tone, focusing on the influence Musk could exert.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement indirectly promotes understanding by highlighting the potential influence of a public figure on regulatory matters. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, contributing to the discussion on regulatory influence. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to discuss the potential impact of a public figure on societal issues, aligning with the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing the influence of a public figure on public policy. [+1]