Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47
|
Score -197

The statement is critical of a political figure and their policies, suggesting that the policies will have negative outcomes contrary to the candidate's claims. It attributes the candidate's success to pandering to young voters, whom it describes negatively. The tone is dismissive and accusatory.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as harmful by dismissing the candidate's policies without substantive evidence and by negatively characterizing young voters. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of young voters, labeling them with negative traits. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism, using ad hominem arguments against the voters. [-2]