The statement addresses a public issue involving a judicial nominee and allegations against him, which is relevant to civic dialogue. It reports on the nominee's denial of allegations and his defense against being labeled negatively, as well as the context of his potential confirmation.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm; it reports on a public figure's response to allegations. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not delving into personal attacks or unnecessary details. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement provides information that could promote understanding of the situation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks and presents the nominee's perspective. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.