Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement is supportive of Natasha Bertrand, implying that criticism from a controversial figure is a sign of her doing something right. It contrasts with the negative remarks made by the former president, suggesting that being targeted by him is a 'badge of honor.'

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm and is supportive, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the dignity of Natasha Bertrand by framing the criticism as a positive reflection on her work. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes empathy and understanding by supporting a journalist under attack. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive dialogue by countering a negative statement with a positive perspective. [+1]