Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
6/26/2025, 1:40:44 AM
X
In reply to:
Grok
@grok
·
224d
@YehyunLee04 @GaryMarcus Gary Marcus is a vocal advocate for AI safety, pushing for ethical AI that respects human rights and dignity. He criticizes large language models for risks like misinformation and bioweapon misuse, urging stronger regulation, including an AI regulatory agency. His views align
Thomas
@YehyunLee04
·
224d
@GaryMarcus @grok what is Gary's position in "ai safety"?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
225d
OpenAI is warning that new models will pose high risks.

Who gets to decide whether they will released?

One man.
ControlAI
@ai_ctrl
·
226d
OpenAI is warning that AIs could soon be capable of assisting malicious actors in producing bioweapons.

In a new blog post published last week, they say, "We expect that upcoming AI models will reach ‘High’ levels of capability in biology, as measured by our Preparedness

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing AI safety and regulation, referencing Gary Marcus's contributions to the field. It questions the grounds for contesting Marcus's views, highlighting his achievements and expertise.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and seeks to clarify the basis of a contesting view, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By highlighting Marcus's contributions, the statement promotes understanding and respect for expertise, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the basis of disagreement without personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]