Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a discussion about the sharing of a Defense Intelligence Agency report, which is a matter of public interest and relates to transparency and accountability in government. It also involves a personal attack on a journalist, which detracts from constructive public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words and actions, but the personal attack on the journalist could be seen as harmful to public discourse. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The personal attack on the journalist violates the principle of respecting the dignity of others and avoiding harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue, as it includes a personal attack rather than addressing the substance of the journalist's question. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly, as it includes a personal attack rather than a substantive response to the question about the intelligence report. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.