Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47

Score 84

Reposted by Gary Marcus

The U.S. built the world’s greatest engine for biomedical research. But a 40% cut to NIH isn’t budget reform, it’s dismantling of the system that will not recover. And let's be clear: Industry won't replace it and philanthropy cannot sustain it.

6/26/2025, 4:13:13 PM

The statement critiques a proposed 40% budget cut to the NIH, arguing it would dismantle the U.S. biomedical research system. It asserts that neither industry nor philanthropy can fill the gap left by such cuts, emphasizing the importance of government funding.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to prevent harm by highlighting potential negative consequences of budget cuts to biomedical research. [+2]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding by explaining the roles of different sectors in funding research and the potential impact of cuts. [+2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of the budget cuts, focusing on their implications rather than personal attacks. [+2]