Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
6/26/2025, 9:35:10 PM
X
In reply to:
Alex Alarga ⏹️
@AlexAlarga
·
225d
@GaryMarcus - in that long exciting conversation with @DanHendrycks and @DKokotajlo I still didn't get to hear a clear definition of ASI, but the KEY point was made by Dan, to simplify:

"SUPERintelligence is un-alignable by definition, so we must #BanSuperintelligence on an
Machine Learning Street Talk
@MLStreetTalk
·
227d
Whether AGI arrives in 3 years or 30, all three agreed current safety measures are inadequate and political intervention may be necessary.
Watch the 2h+ deep dive on MLST. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=…

The statement engages in a public discourse about the alignment of superintelligence, challenging the notion that it is inherently unalignable. It questions the validity of defining superintelligence as unalignable and suggests that not all smarter-than-human machines must be unalignable. This contributes to the ongoing debate about AI safety and alignment.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and encourages critical thinking about AI alignment. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by questioning assumptions and encouraging a deeper examination of the topic. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by challenging a claim without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]