In reply to:
The Galois Connection
@TheGaloisCxn
·
225d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
225d
The Galois Connection
@TheGaloisCxn
·
225d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing AI alignment and the unexpected findings of a research paper. It highlights concerns about AI safety and alignment, referencing a study that found emergent misalignment in AI models. The conversation critiques the fine-tuning process and its implications for AI behavior, contributing to the broader debate on AI ethics and safety.
- The statement raises awareness about potential harm caused by AI misalignment, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by discussing the unexpected results of AI research, encouraging further exploration and discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning and analyzing the findings without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.