Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47
|
Score -202

The statement criticizes foreign censorship of social media and calls for US officials to take action against it. It uses strong language, referring to foreign leaders as 'tin pot dictators,' which may undermine respectful discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to protect free speech, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions, but the aggressive language could be seen as harmful.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The use of derogatory terms for foreign leaders does not respect their dignity, violating this principle. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses inflammatory language rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in personal attacks by labeling leaders as 'tin pot dictators,' which violates the principle of avoiding ad hominem arguments. [-1]