Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47
|
Score -202
6/27/2025, 12:30:20 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
7d
The sinister Lula and creepy Moraes are trying to intimidate my colleagues and me. We won’t back down.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
436d
We Exposed Censorship By Brazil’s Supreme Court, And Now President Lula Is Persecuting Me

PLUS: Brazil’s Attorney General Is Seeking To Entirely Shut Down X, Formerly Known As Twitter

Thirty years ago this year, I asked Brazil’s current president, who goes by the single name
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
7d
President Trump and Secretary Rubio must not let these tin pot dictators censor speech and ban the world’s most important social media company.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
37d
Around the world, governments are threatening & censoring US social media platforms for legal speech. Now, @SecRubio @StateDept says it will deny visas to foreign nationals engaged in censorship against Americans, US tech companies, and people posting from inside the US.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
7d
Brazil has been banning and censoring journalists and politicians for years. But now it is taking steps to ban X entirely. It’s time for @SecRubio to block President Lula, Justice Moraes, and their criminal accomplices from entering the US.

The statement and linked content engage in public discourse by discussing political actions, censorship, and accusations of Nazism. The tone is critical and accusatory, focusing on political figures and their actions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by making strong accusations without clear evidence, potentially inciting further division. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved, using derogatory language and accusations. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism, using terms like 'sinister' and 'creepy.' [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion but does so in a divisive manner. [-1]