Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) predictions, specifically addressing the credibility and track record of individuals making these predictions. The tone is inquisitive, questioning why a particular individual, Amodei, is being viewed charitably in the context of their prediction record.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the reasoning behind a charitable view of Amodei's predictions. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but rather seeks clarification and understanding. [+1]