Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
8d
The statement expresses concern over Brazil's new internet regulations, comparing them to China's censorship. It calls for action from U.S. political figures, suggesting a strong response to Brazil's policies. The tone is alarmist and critical, aiming to draw attention to perceived threats to free speech.
- The statement uses strong language that could incite fear, potentially causing harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It criticizes Brazilian leaders, which could be seen as disrespectful, but does not engage in direct hate speech. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on alarm and action. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive dialogue, opting for a confrontational approach. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for political action, aiming to impact international relations. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.