Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 114
6/28/2025, 10:07:25 PM
X
In reply to:
Brendan Hogan
@brendanh0gan
·
47d
@GaryMarcus @Kasparov63 great essay thank you - do you feel, though, there is something inherently flawed with the architecture?

Or could an LLM model with the correct training and tools develop world models?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
47d
A long essay on chess and world models and LLMs and why I think pure LLMs are hopeless as a substrate for AGI.

One of the more important essays I have written in a long time, and a good bookend to my “A knockout blow for LLMs?” on the Apple paper.

CC: @Kasparov63

The statement is part of a discussion on the limitations of large language models (LLMs) in developing world models, which is a topic of public interest in AI development. The tone is analytical and seeks to engage in a constructive dialogue about the inherent flaws in LLM architecture.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and contributes to a technical discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a discussion about AI limitations. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the architecture of LLMs without personal attacks. [+1]