Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 115
6/29/2025, 1:27:20 AM
X
In reply to:
Holly ⏸️ Elmore
@ilex_ulmus
·
39d
@GaryMarcus The whole thing exists to address AI danger and the reception of me and PauseAI since I started working on it is that it’s corrupting deception to talk about AI danger in a way the public can understand. Oh and I’m stupid and a poser. (And a girl who’s probably glamouring them.)
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
39d
@ilex_ulmus what i saw today didn’t inspire confidence
Holly ⏸️ Elmore
@ilex_ulmus
·
39d
@GaryMarcus Lesswrong is the worst. Sorry for all the delusional commenters here who think that’s real discourse. Even on topics besides AI where the general bias is less bad it’s still mainly interested in creating the feeling of being brutally honest and intellectually discriminating.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
39d
I had recently been encourage to post to Less Wrong and was planning to do so.

If my interactions today are a guide, I am less inclined.

Other people’s views?

The statement 'what nonsense' is dismissive and lacks substantive engagement with the ongoing discussion about AI danger and public discourse. It does not contribute constructively to the conversation and instead dismisses the previous points without providing any reasoning or evidence.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm as it dismisses the previous comment without constructive engagement, potentially undermining the dignity of the person it addresses. [-1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is dismissive and could be seen as a personal attack, as it does not provide any reasoning or evidence to support its dismissal. [-2]