Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a debate about AI predictions and the standards of judgment applied to different individuals in the field. The tone is critical, pointing out perceived inconsistencies in how predictions are evaluated. The intent seems to be to highlight a perceived bias or unfairness in the discourse around AI predictions.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses the term 'maximally invidious language,' which suggests a violation of the principle to do no harm with words, as it implies the use of language intended to provoke or offend. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of 'maximally invidious language' could be seen as disrespectful, potentially undermining the dignity of others involved in the discussion. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement criticizes the perceived inconsistency in judgment standards but does not engage in personal attacks. It focuses on the actions and statements of others rather than their character, which aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism. [+1]