Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 110
6/29/2025, 2:31:18 AM
X
In reply to:
Prashant
@Prashant_1722
·
28d
@GaryMarcus Google DeepMind can though
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
28d
o3 can’t play chess. what does that tell us about dreams of AGI?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
28d
A long essay on chess and world models and LLMs and why I think pure LLMs are hopeless as a substrate for AGI.

One of the more important essays I have written in a long time, and a good bookend to my “A knockout blow for LLMs?” on the Apple paper.

CC: @Kasparov63

The statement is part of a discussion on the capabilities of AI, specifically regarding its ability to play chess and implications for AGI (Artificial General Intelligence). The conversation critiques the limitations of current AI models, suggesting that they are not yet capable of achieving AGI. The tone is analytical and engages with ongoing debates about AI's potential and limitations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive discussion about AI capabilities. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a technical discussion about AI limitations. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]