Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the limitations of generative AI and large language models (LLMs) in achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI). The tone is analytical and critical, aiming to provoke thought and discussion on the capabilities and shortcomings of AI technologies.
- The statement does not cause harm and instead contributes to a critical analysis of AI technologies. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging readers to consider the limitations of current AI models. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI technologies without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.