Gary Marcus

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 67
6/29/2025, 2:13:14 PM
X
In reply to:
Zack Dulberg
@pianozack
·
22d
@GaryMarcus @chatgpt21 Have you considered that even an AGI will continue to make dumb mistakes but ONLY FOR YOU just to mess with you and keep you angry for eternity because of how annoying you've been ?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
22d
@chatgpt21 Chris, I honestly and truly cannot believe how dumb this tweet is, on multiple levels. One is that you OBVIOUSLY didn’t read the paper that you are criticizing.

The other is this: If GPT-5 can’t play chess without making illegal moves 5% of the time – despite exposure to
Chris
@chatgpt21
·
22d
Gary Marcus can’t go 5 minutes without saying o3 can’t play chess.

Eventually it will be “GPT 5 can play chess but it made an illegal move 5% of the time”

The statement is dismissive and insulting, targeting an individual's intelligence and employment status. It does not engage constructively with the ongoing discussion about AI capabilities and instead resorts to personal attacks.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement violates the principle of doing no harm by using derogatory language. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It disrespects the dignity of others by engaging in a personal attack. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement fails to engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses an ad hominem argument. [-2]