In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
13d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
13d
The statement criticizes a political figure's proposal to adjust tax burdens, framing it as racially motivated and contrary to Dr. Martin Luther King's principles. The tone is accusatory and alarmist, suggesting that the proposal is a form of anti-white racism. It implies that electing the figure would be a mistake for New Yorkers.
- The statement uses charged language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by misrepresenting the proposal as racially motivated. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of the individual it criticizes, engaging in a form of public shaming. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead framing the issue in a divisive manner. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, opting for personal attacks rather than addressing the policy's merits or drawbacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.