Michael Schellenberger

The statement engages in a historical comparison between Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, suggesting they were ideological opposites. It critiques Spike Lee's portrayal of these figures in his films, particularly focusing on Malcolm X's views. The tone is critical and attempts to clarify historical perspectives, but it also includes a charged interpretation of Malcolm X's stance as 'overt anti-white racism.'

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could perpetuate harm by oversimplifying complex historical figures and their ideologies, potentially misrepresenting their contributions and views. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It does not respect the dignity of historical figures by reducing their ideologies to simplistic oppositions, which could be seen as a form of misrepresentation. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on divisive interpretations rather than fostering a nuanced discussion. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, as it does not acknowledge the complexity of the historical context or the figures involved. [-1]