Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by suggesting they are an imitation of thinking and lack a true understanding of the world. It references cognitive science tests as evidence and implies that big companies may be overlooking these shortcomings.
- The statement does not use harmful language or actions, maintaining a neutral tone in its critique of LLMs. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by referencing cognitive science, though it could be more explicit in fostering empathy or compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of LLMs and companies, avoiding personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly critiquing LLMs and their development. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.