Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
6/29/2025, 4:20:04 PM
X
In reply to:
Bogdan Ionut Cirstea
@BogdanIonutCir2
·
11d
@GaryMarcus @primalpoly they aren't being handed the world's infra, we're barely even allowing self-driving cars on roads, even when they're starting to be empirically safer than human drivers
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
11d
Here is the best argument for pausing AI until safety is worked out (however many centuries that might take, per @primalpoly).

• You can’t possibly follow laws like Asimov’s Laws (or better alternatives to them) if you can’t reliably learn to abide by simple thing like the
neuralamp
@neuralamp4ever
·
11d
@GaryMarcus

The statement discusses the potential use of AI by the military, which is a significant public issue related to ethics, safety, and governance of AI technologies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about the potential harm of AI in military applications, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By engaging in a discussion about AI safety and military use, the statement promotes understanding and awareness of the implications of AI technologies. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement contributes to a dialogue about AI ethics and safety, engaging constructively with differing viewpoints. [+1]