Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47

Score 64

@robinhanson @primalpoly we have an imperfect system of laws that to some degree keeps than in check

vs (roughly speaking) fuck-all for LLMs.

6/29/2025, 7:12:10 PM

In reply to:

Robin Hanson

@robinhanson

@GaryMarcus @primalpoly Humans don't follow those three laws, yet they run the world's infrastructure.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

Here is the best argument for pausing AI until safety is worked out (however many centuries that might take, per @primalpoly).

• You can’t possibly follow laws like Asimov’s Laws (or better alternatives to them) if you can’t reliably learn to abide by simple thing like the

neuralamp

@neuralamp4ever

@GaryMarcus

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the regulation and safety of AI systems compared to human laws. It highlights concerns about the lack of regulatory frameworks for AI, suggesting a need for oversight similar to human laws.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement raises concerns about AI safety, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding by comparing AI regulation to human legal systems, fostering a discussion on AI safety. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to previous comments and contributing to the debate on AI regulation. [+1]