Reposted by Gary Marcus
Axios Pro
@AxiosPro
·
7d
The statement addresses a public issue concerning the regulation of AI and its implications for state laws, particularly those protecting young people online. The tone is concerned and critical, aiming to highlight potential weaknesses in the proposed legislative changes.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on expressing concerns about legislative impacts, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By raising concerns about the potential weakening of protections for young people, the statement promotes understanding and empathy for vulnerable groups. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the legislative proposal, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to responsibly discuss a significant public policy issue, upholding the principles of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.