Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
6/30/2025, 2:53:50 PM
X
In reply to:
Dariusz Swierk PhD
@swierk
·
3d
@GaryMarcus @DarioAmodei @ChengleiSi I'll be rooting for Dario. 2.5 years is a long time for AI. Maybe it's worth building superintelligence architecture just for the sake of this bet?

I'll definitely start thinking about it in the field of scientific discovery. I think the solution lies in agents and symbolic AI.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
3d
🎺 I am hereby publicly offering to bet @darioamodei $1,000,000 that AI in 2027 will NOT be “smarter than Nobel Prize winners across most fields in science and engineering”. 🎺

Why? We are nowhere close. Consider:

• New Stanford study from @ChengleiSi shows that “LLM ideas

The statement engages in a discussion about the potential of AI to transform science, expressing skepticism about the speed of such advancements. It acknowledges the transformative potential of AI while maintaining a realistic perspective on the timeline.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and maintains a respectful tone. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by acknowledging the potential of AI while also expressing a realistic view. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages in constructive dialogue by expressing a differing opinion without personal attacks. [+1]