Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47
|
Score -202
Chamath Palihapitiya
@chamath
路
4d
This guy is definitely talented.

A rich kid LARP鈥檌ng as a poor mans defender. But anyone who has grown up poor (I grew up on welfare) or people who are poor hate people like this.

None of us wanted to stay poor. We wanted to be rich and never look back. The hard work,
6/30/2025, 7:14:53 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
路
4d
@galexybrane Look how calmly @ZohranKMamdani gaslights 馃毄馃毄馃毄
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
路
5d
The website of NYC mayoral frontrunner says he'll "shift the tax burden" to "whiter neighborhoods." When asked about his openly racist agenda, @ZohranKMamdani insists it's not a proposal at all but rather "a description of what we see right now." That's next-level gaslighting.馃槵
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
路
4d
This article and video were coauthored with @galexybrane , a non-entitled Millennial.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
路
9d
The election of a charismatic democratic socialist as the Democratic Party鈥檚 mayoral candidate yesterday stunned New York's political establishment and appears to signal the most radical shift in city politics in a generation. With no executive experience, limited name
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
路
4d
New York's socialist mayoral frontrunner appeals to youthful idealism, say the media. In truth, he appeals to their entitlement and envy.

Like Mamdani himself, his most vocal supporters grew up in comfort and were told they were exceptional. They were shielded from the
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
路
9d
New York's socialist mayoral frontrunner says his policies will lower housing and food prices, and reduce crime and disorder. They won't. They'll increase them. The reason he won is because he pandered to young voters afflicted by envy, entitlement, and willful ignorance.

The conversation involves a critique of a political figure and their supporters, using terms like 'gaslighting' and 'entitlement.' The tone is confrontational and dismissive, with personal attacks and assumptions about socioeconomic backgrounds. This discourse does not promote understanding or empathy and engages in ad hominem arguments.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses language that could be considered harmful, such as 'gaslighting' and 'entitlement,' which may perpetuate negative stereotypes.聽[-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, engaging in personal attacks and assumptions about individuals' backgrounds.聽[-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering division and misunderstanding.聽[-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism, violating principles of respectful dialogue.聽[-2]