Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47

Score -202

Reposted by Michael Shellenberger

It should go without saying but apparently it doesn’t: haters like that rapper should be free to say hateful things, including and especially in the United States. It makes America look weak denying visas on the basis of things people say, or sing, even if the courts rule it

6/30/2025, 8:16:28 PM

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing free speech and censorship, particularly in the context of denying visas based on speech. It argues for the protection of free speech, even if it involves hate speech, as a fundamental American value.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by advocating for the protection of hate speech, which might perpetuate harm against targeted groups. [-1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses its platform to argue for free speech, which can be seen as a societal good, but it does not address the potential harm of hate speech.
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement strongly supports free speech, aligning with the principle of upholding free speech, but it does not consider the balance between free speech and preventing harm. [+1]