Gary Marcus

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 53

The statement discusses Meta's recent actions and strategic positioning in the AI industry, questioning their future leadership in AI. It engages with public discourse by addressing the implications of corporate strategies on technological advancement and leadership in AI.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm with words or actions, as it neutrally presents facts and a question about Meta's future in AI.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does encourage consideration of Meta's role in AI development.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement invites constructive dialogue by posing a question about Meta's future leadership, without engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By discussing Meta's potential impact on AI, the statement uses its influence to highlight important societal and technological issues. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing Meta's actions and potential future in AI without making unfounded claims. [+1]