The statement speculates on the potential impact on OpenAI if Apple chooses a competitor's technology, suggesting a lack of confidence in OpenAI. It reflects on business dynamics and competition in the tech industry.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies a negative outcome for OpenAI, which could be seen as speculative.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but could be seen as undermining the dignity of OpenAI by suggesting a 'vote of non-confidence.' [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and leans towards a negative speculation without evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.