The statement expresses skepticism about the consensus on achieving AGI, suggesting that while many claim to have solutions, none truly do. It critiques the competitive nature of AI development and the portrayal of certainty in the field.
- The statement does not cause harm but highlights the uncertainty in AGI development. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by questioning the perceived certainty in AI advancements. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- Engages in constructive criticism by questioning the motives behind AI companies' claims. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.