Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64

The statement critiques a Microsoft AI study, suggesting it was unfair by highlighting a disparity in resources between AI and doctors. The tone is critical and aims to question the validity of the study's claims.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight potential flaws in the study, which could be seen as striving to prevent misinformation, aligning with doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The critique respects privacy but questions the integrity of the study, which is a form of constructive criticism rather than harassment. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By questioning the study, the statement encourages critical thinking and understanding of AI's role in healthcare. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out perceived flaws without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]