The statement expresses a strong opinion on a legislative outcome, framing it as a victory for humanity against big tech lobbying. It highlights the role of various advocates and volunteers in achieving this result.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses strong language against big tech, which could be seen as adversarial.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of the legislative process and the efforts of various groups, aligning with empathy and compassion for those advocating for online safety. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but uses a confrontational tone towards big tech, which may not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.