The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue: the potential impact of proposed federal budget changes on public health. It provides a research-backed warning about the consequences of policy decisions, contributing to civic dialogue on healthcare and economic policy.
- The statement strives to do no harm by highlighting potential negative outcomes of policy changes, aiming to prevent harm through awareness. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing research-based evidence on the impact of policy changes, fostering empathy for those affected. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the proposed budget, focusing on policy implications rather than personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to inform the public and policymakers about the potential consequences of budget changes, aiming for societal betterment. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using research to inform public debate on policy issues. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.