Reposted by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
The statement appears to be a headline for an opinion piece that critiques a legislative bill, suggesting it betrays the working class. This indicates engagement with public issues, specifically labor rights and legislative impacts, which constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of a bill that may harm the working class, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by highlighting potential negative impacts.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, as it focuses on a legislative critique rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By addressing the impact of legislation on the working class, the statement promotes understanding and empathy for this demographic.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement appears to engage in constructive criticism of a bill, though the use of 'betrays' could be seen as strong language. It does not engage in personal attacks, focusing on the bill itself.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight issues affecting the working class, aiming for societal betterment by drawing attention to potential legislative shortcomings.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing a public policy issue, using its platform to engage in civic dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.