Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement by @RepFine constitutes public discourse as it engages in a public debate about the presence and actions of political figures, touching on issues of international relations and religious identity.
- The statement does harm by using inflammatory language and making an unfounded accusation, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement disrespects the dignity of a fellow member of Congress by engaging in hate speech and potentially inciting harassment based on religious identity. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses divisive and accusatory language. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead resorting to a personal attack and ad hominem argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use the platform responsibly, as it undermines the principles of free speech by promoting hate speech and personal attacks. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.