In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
32d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the perception of the MAGA coalition and its relationship with Donald Trump. It challenges the narrative that MAGA is a cult of personality by highlighting a specific instance where supporters broke with Trump. The tone is analytical, aiming to provide a counter-narrative to a common media portrayal.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm and instead seeks to clarify a political stance. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It attempts to promote understanding by providing an alternative perspective on the MAGA coalition. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a disagreement with media portrayals without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.